> 2) small to big

+1 from me


Ricardo Rocha wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

 1) big to small -> give users all possible freedom and restrict that
freedom once we understand potentially problematic usages.

 2) small to big -> give users the least possible freedom based on some
required functionality and grow as the users express their needs.

+1 for big to small

But this *must* be an error ;-)


The FOM design that was proposed by myself and Ricardo follows
methodology #2.

Joerg


--

System Development
VIRBUS AG
Fon  +49(0)341-979-7419
Fax  +49(0)341-979-7409
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.virbus.de



Reply via email to