Rosalyn,
That could be interesting, but the real issue would be to compare those
results with actual employment results. The members of c4l are
self-selected and won't be representative of the actual worker-bee
situation. (e.g. it will be heavily weighted for academic libraries, I
bet).
kc
On 11/27/12 8:46 AM, Rosalyn Metz wrote:
Ok since I brought up our demographics I'll run the survey (I like
surveys). Simple survey with two questions:
1) Do you consider yourself part of the Code4Lib Community
2) What is your self-identified gender
I'll send it out at the end of today if there are no objections to the
questions and then share findings next week.
Thoughts?
Rosalyn
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Karen Coyle <[email protected]> wrote:
I would really like to see such a survey. I did one at my previous place
of work, the California Digital Library (nee Division of Library
Automation) where I worked for over 20 years. I had kept org charts and
phone lists, and was able to see that over that span of two decades the
tech staff (which was most everyone there since all we did was tech
development) was from 2/3 to 3/4 female. But when I said this in front of a
group of employees the men were startled. I'm guessing that they saw
themselves as techies, and the women as "helpers" -- even though the DBA,
the data designers, and many of the programmers were women. So it's not
that there aren't women in technology, it's that the women in technology
are often considered to be "not doing technology" because they are women.
[1]
So we should survey. I believe that we will find that in library
technology departments there are many "invisible" women. Sadly, women will
be more present in that environment for the wrong reasons -- mainly that
it's lower paying and that men are more likely to get the higher paying
industry jobs. (The University of California overall staff ratio is 65%
female -- as perhaps many government agencies are.)
kc
[1] Must read: Joanna Russ. How to suppress women's writing.
http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/**9392874<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/9392874>It's
about writing but actually pertains to all activities.
On 11/27/12 6:57 AM, Rosalyn Metz wrote:
I think first we would need to do a survey of how many women are in the
community. if it turns out that this community is only 17% women then
we're on target. who knows, maybe we're actually 10% women and we're way
above target. in which case the real question might be "how do we get
more
women in tech."
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Chad Nelson <[email protected]>
wrote:
Ooops. Hit the wrong key.
So, about our presenters...
Is it a problem that only 4 of our 33 presenters are women? Or that only
16
of 95 proposers were women?
Is there something this community needs to do to encourage more women to
feel like they can and should speak / propose sessions?
--
Karen Coyle
[email protected] http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
--
Karen Coyle
[email protected] http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
