I would also go with the $120 3 year wildcard cert for ezproxy. What vendor are you using? > On Jan 14, 2016, at 7:23 PM, Cary Gordon <listu...@chillco.com> wrote: > > I love the idea of Let’s Encrypt, but I recently bought a three year wildcard > cert subscription for about $120. I would need to fall firmly into the true > believer category to go the route you suggest. > > Cary > >> On Jan 14, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Eric Hellman <e...@hellman.net> wrote: >> >> A while back, the issue of needing a wildcard certificate (not supported by >> Lets Encrypt) for EZProxy was discussed. >> >> In my discussions with publishers about switching to HTTPS, EZProxy >> compatibility has been the most frequently mentioned stumbling block >> preventing a complete switch to HTTPS for some HTTPS-ready publishers. In >> two cases that I know of, a publisher which has been HTTPS-only was asked by >> a library customer to provide insecure service (oh the horror!) for this >> reason. >> >> It's been pointed out to me that while Lets Encrypt is not supporting >> wildcard certificates, up to 100 hostnames can be supported on a single LE >> certificate. A further limit on certificates issued per week per domain >> would mean that up to 500 hostnames can be registered with LE in a week. >> >> Are there EZProxy instances out there that need more than 500 hostnames, >> assuming that all services are switched to HTTPS? >> >> Also, I blogged my experience talking to people about privacy at #ALAMW16. >> http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2016/01/not-using-https-on-your-website-is-like.html >> >> <http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2016/01/not-using-https-on-your-website-is-like.html> >> >> Eric >> >> >> Eric Hellman >> President, Free Ebook Foundation >> Founder, Unglue.it https://unglue.it/ >> https://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/ >> twitter: @gluejar >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
