[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15573966#comment-15573966
 ] 

Ben Slater commented on CASSANDRA-12490:
----------------------------------------

Moving back from dev list where I think the discussion ended up by accident. 

Jake said:
No I'm not using a seq anywhere else then the command line

I said:
OK, I think it’s pretty unlikely to be this change as I didn’t change the 
existing code (certainly nothing near what is used by -pop) and also I just 
noticed you said you had the issue in 3.9 and CASS-12490 is destined for 3.10. 

Also, last time I looked, I thought stress didn’t validate returned results for 
YAML specs. Did I miss something or did that get added recently? Can you add 
your actual command, etc to the ticket?

Anyway, I will try to do some more digging over the weekend as I still suspect 
there is something wrong (or at least unexpected) going on aside from this 
change.

> Add sequence distribution type to cassandra stress
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-12490
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12490
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Tools
>            Reporter: Ben Slater
>            Assignee: Ben Slater
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.10
>
>         Attachments: 12490-trunk.patch, 12490.yaml, cqlstress-seq-example.yaml
>
>
> When using the write command, cassandra stress sequentially generates seeds. 
> This ensures generated values don't overlap (unless the sequence wraps) 
> providing more predictable number of inserted records (and generating a base 
> set of data without wasted writes).
> When using a yaml stress spec there is no sequenced distribution available. 
> It think it would be useful to have this for doing initial load of data for 
> testing 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to