[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098171#comment-16098171
]
ZhaoYang commented on CASSANDRA-12952:
--------------------------------------
LGTM.. using byteman to test atomicity is really brilliant and I learned. now
apache-c*-dtest is ready, we need to move to new repo.
failed dtest are irrelevant :
>
> bootstrap_test.TestBootstrap.consistent_range_movement_false_with_rf1_should_succeed_test
> -> known
> materialized_views_test.py:TestMaterializedViews.view_tombstone_test -> the
> tracing format for diggest is wrong: "Digest mismatch: {} on 127.0.0.1". I
> will open another ticket for it.
> AlterTableStatement propagates base table and affected MV changes
> inconsistently
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-12952
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12952
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Distributed Metadata, Materialized Views
> Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Assignee: Andrés de la Peña
> Fix For: 3.0.x, 3.11.x, 4.x
>
>
> In {{AlterTableStatement}}, when renaming columns or changing their types, we
> also keep track of all affected MVs - ones that also need column renames or
> type changes. Then in the end we announce the migration for the table change,
> and afterwards, separately, one for each affected MV.
> This creates a window in which view definitions and base table definition are
> not in sync with each other. If a node fails in between receiving those
> pushes, it's likely to have startup issues.
> The fix is trivial: table change and affected MV change should be pushed as a
> single schema mutation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org
