[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13085152#comment-13085152
 ] 

Paul Loy edited comment on CASSANDRA-2820 at 8/15/11 10:22 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

Hey Sylvian,

likewise sorry for my delay. Have been job hunting, and will now be relocating 
to LA from London.

I've just rebased, will attach a patch.

Paul

      was (Author: keteracel):
    Hey Silvian,

likewise sorry for my delay. Have been job hunting, and will now be relocating 
to LA from London.

I've just rebased, will attach a patch.

Paul
  
> Re-introduce FastByteArrayInputStream (and Output equivalent)
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-2820
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2820
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
>         Environment: n/a
>            Reporter: Paul Loy
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: bytearrayinputstream, bytearrayoutputstream, license, 
> synchronized
>             Fix For: 1.0
>
>         Attachments: fast_bytearray_iostreams_harmony-patch-2.txt, 
> fast_bytearray_iostreams_harmony-patch-3.txt, 
> fast_bytearray_iostreams_harmony-patch-4.txt, 
> fast_bytearray_iostreams_harmony-patch-5.txt
>
>
> In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-37 
> FastByteArrayInputStream and FastByteArrayOutputStream were removed due to 
> being code copied from the JDK and then subsequently modified. The JDK 
> license is incompatible with Apache 2 license so the code had to go.
> I have since had a look at the performance of the JDK ByteArrayInputStream 
> and a FastByteArrayInputStream (i.e. one with synchronized methods made 
> un-synchronized) and seen the difference is significant.
> After a warmup-period of >10000 loops I get the following for 10000 loops 
> through a 128000 byte array:
> bais : 3513ms
> fbais: 72ms
> This varies depending on the OS, machine and Java version, but it's always in 
> favour of the FastByteArrayInputStream as you might expect.
> Then, at Jonathan Ellis' suggestion, I tried this using a modified Apache 
> Harmony ByteArrayInputStream - i.e. one whose license is compatible - and the 
> results were the same. A significant boost.
> I will attach a patch with changes for the 0.8.0 tag.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to