[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17756841#comment-17756841
 ] 

Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-8303:
----------------------------------------------

This was supposed to be per-role. Guardrails affecting entire nodes.

> Create a capability limitation framework
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8303
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8303
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Legacy/Distributed Metadata
>            Reporter: Anupam Arora
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 5.x
>
>
> In addition to our current Auth framework that acts as a white list, and 
> regulates access to data, functions, and roles, it would be beneficial to 
> have a different, capability limitation framework, that would be orthogonal 
> to Auth, and would act as a blacklist.
> Example uses:
> - take away the ability to TRUNCATE from all users but the admin (TRUNCATE 
> itself would still require MODIFY permission)
> - take away the ability to use ALLOW FILTERING from all users but 
> Spark/Hadoop (SELECT would still require SELECT permission)
> - take away the ability to use UNLOGGED BATCH from everyone (the operation 
> itself would still require MODIFY permission)
> - take away the ability to use certain consistency levels (make certain 
> tables LWT-only for all users, for example)
> Original description:
> Please provide a "strict mode" option in cassandra that will kick out any CQL 
> queries that are expensive, e.g. any query with ALLOWS FILTERING, 
> multi-partition queries, secondary index queries, etc.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to