[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17842576#comment-17842576
 ] 

Yuqi Yan commented on CASSANDRA-19556:
--------------------------------------

okay I just realized there is a similar feature already added in 5.0: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17495

The implementation was also adding these check for these statements. I guess 
with 17495 we don't need DDL guardrail, but still we can have this DCL 
guardrail. wdyt? [~smiklosovic] 

> Guardrail to block DDL/DCL queries
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-19556
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19556
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Feature/Guardrails
>            Reporter: Yuqi Yan
>            Assignee: Yuqi Yan
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 5.x
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Sometimes we want to block DDL/DCL queries to stop new schemas being created 
> or roles created. (e.g. when doing live-upgrade)
> For DDL guardrail current implementation won't block the query if it's no-op 
> (e.g. CREATE TABLE...IF NOT EXISTS, but table already exists, etc. The 
> guardrail check is added in apply() right after all the existence check)
> I don't have preference on either block every DDL query or check whether if 
> it's no-op here. Just we have some users always run CREATE..IF NOT EXISTS.. 
> at startup, which is no-op but will be blocked by this guardrail and failed 
> to start.
>  
> 4.1 PR: [https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/3248]
> trunk PR: [https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/3275]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to