[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13621414#comment-13621414
 ] 

Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-5371:
-------------------------------------------

Alternate implementation pushed to 
http://github.com/jbellis/cassandra/commits/5371 with the following 
improvements:

- Only applies STCS to L0 if L0 gets behind (defined as "accumulates more than 
MAX_COMPACTING_L0 sstables")
- Performs true STCS, rather than "compact in sets of four and then never again"
                
> Perform size-tiered compactions in L0
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-5371
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5371
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: T Jake Luciani
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>         Attachments: HybridCompactionStrategy.java
>
>
> If LCS gets behind, read performance deteriorates as we have to check bloom 
> filters on man sstables in L0.  For wide rows, this can mean having to seek 
> for each one since the BF doesn't help us reject much.
> Performing size-tiered compaction in L0 will mitigate this until we can catch 
> up on merging it into higher levels.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to