[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13686761#comment-13686761
 ] 

Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-4495:
---------------------------------------------

Haven't really look at the detail of the patch, but for what it's worth, I've 
somehow never been a fan of the compose/decompose terminology. I'd prefer say 
encode/decode or serialize/deserialize. And BooleanCodec or BooleanSerializer 
sounds better to my hear than BooleanComposer. But do feel free to discard that 
opinion if it's just me being french and if composer sounds perfectly fine to 
you guys.
                
> Don't tie client side use of AbstractType to JDBC
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-4495
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4495
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Assignee: Carl Yeksigian
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>         Attachments: 4495.patch, 4495-v2.patch
>
>
> We currently expose the AbstractType to java clients that want to reuse them 
> though the cql.jdbc.* classes. I think this shouldn't be tied to the JDBC 
> standard. JDBC was make for SQL DB, which Cassandra is not (CQL is not SQL 
> and will never be). Typically, there is a fair amount of the JDBC standard 
> that cannot be implemented with C*, and there is a number of specificity of 
> C* that are not in JDBC (typically the set and maps collections).
> So I propose to extract simple type classes with just a compose and decompose 
> method (but without ties to jdbc, which would allow all the jdbc specific 
> method those types have) in the purpose of exporting that in a separate jar 
> for clients (we could put that in a org.apache.cassandra.type package for 
> instance). We could then deprecate the jdbc classes with basically the same 
> schedule than CQL2.
> Let me note that this is *not* saying there shouldn't be a JDBC driver for 
> Cassandra.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to