[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13986065#comment-13986065
 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-4718:
-------------------------------------

Yes, typo - corrected. Yeah, just straight up read or write requests (I can 
push the same for both, but they tank for writes when we start hitting 
compaction/flush etc). I'm being as conservative as possible and assuming every 
core is spending every moment working on one of the ops (in reality it's more 
like half of that time). I don't have CASSANDRA-7061 yet to have any really 
accurate numbers to play with.

As regards costs for unpark(), I've timed them in the past and that's in the 
ball park of what you'd expect given the literature and general OS behaviour 
(10us is probably a bit heavier than they often clock in, but a good figure to 
work with)

> More-efficient ExecutorService for improved throughput
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-4718
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4718
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Jason Brown
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: performance
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: 4718-v1.patch, PerThreadQueue.java, baq vs trunk.png, op 
> costs of various queues.ods, stress op rate with various queues.ods, 
> v1-stress.out
>
>
> Currently all our execution stages dequeue tasks one at a time.  This can 
> result in contention between producers and consumers (although we do our best 
> to minimize this by using LinkedBlockingQueue).
> One approach to mitigating this would be to make consumer threads do more 
> work in "bulk" instead of just one task per dequeue.  (Producer threads tend 
> to be single-task oriented by nature, so I don't see an equivalent 
> opportunity there.)
> BlockingQueue has a drainTo(collection, int) method that would be perfect for 
> this.  However, no ExecutorService in the jdk supports using drainTo, nor 
> could I google one.
> What I would like to do here is create just such a beast and wire it into (at 
> least) the write and read stages.  (Other possible candidates for such an 
> optimization, such as the CommitLog and OutboundTCPConnection, are not 
> ExecutorService-based and will need to be one-offs.)
> AbstractExecutorService may be useful.  The implementations of 
> ICommitLogExecutorService may also be useful. (Despite the name these are not 
> actual ExecutorServices, although they share the most important properties of 
> one.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to