But I'm not opposed to a 1.1 release.
Committers, indicate your preference please Release is a 1.1 or 2.0
Dirk
David Graham wrote:
Why are we changing the major release version number? Have backward incompatible changes occurred? If not, we should stick to incrementing the minor version number in the 1.x series.
David
--- Dirk Verbeeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to propose a vote on the following release plan for DBCP 2.0. This release plan can also be found at:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons/dbcp/RELEASE_PLAN_2_0.txt
Per the Jakarta/ASF guidelines (see http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html), this release plan must be approved via a lazy majority vote. The voting period will end at 23:59:59 GMT on 1 October 2003 or when a clear majority has been established, whichever comes first.
Here's your ballot:
<---- Please return this portion with your vote ----> [ ] +1 I am in favor of this plan and I will help [ ] +0 I am in favor of this plan, but I am unable to help [ ] -0 I am not in favor of this plan [ ] -1 I am opposed to this plan being executed, and my reason is:
<---- /Please return this portion with your vote ---->
I'll volunteer to be the release manager for this release, but if someone else wants to, feel free to volunteer.
- Dirk Verbeeck
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
