I grokk why now. Xxx is primitives, so an utter pain to deal with
generically. My 'easily' below is a massive over-statement :)

Still would be nice if when I change the LongConverter in a system, the
default is that the LongArrayConverter also changes its atomic behaviour.

Hen

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:

>
> Looking at the converters, there is a batch of XxxArrayConverters. These
> extend AbstractArrayConverter which has the code necessary to parse a
> comma delimited array.
>
> My question being, why does CharacterArrayConverter et al even exist?
>
> It seems that there could easily be an ArrayConverter which is created
> with a Converter object and optionally another Object which is the default
> value. If no array default, then it would return a similar array based on
> the value returned from the passed in converter [which might be its
> default].
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Hen
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to