2007/5/17, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 5/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey wait a moment! I don't want to annoy you, but if a JAR has been created > and made available to the public, it is typical to create a new version (in > your case 1.3.3). > As Wendy (Smoak) noted, when someone writes in the mailing list about a > 1.3.2 version, you will say "what 1.3.2 version?". > It could be a nightmare to track it. > I don't think that a few license headers are a problem, but anyway... We haven't yet released a version 1.3.2. Of course, if we had, then I'd never dare to call this 1.3.2 again.
I was talking about those jars in people.apache.org. For a while, there where JAR files with the 1.3.2 version, right? And they where available for the public. You know, users can download them and you will never notice it :-) I hope I don't seem rude Antonio
