> Yes, we heard that argument for years in computer chess and it never > happened. > > Do you have some kind of basis for believe that?
i wouldn't argue that future algorithms can't be time-doubled beyond the existing skill level of people, just that the current evidence is weak that we already have such algorithms in hand. s. ____________________________________________________________________________________ TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
