Chrilly wrote:
I think on 9x9 the superiority of search based programms is now
clearly demonstrated. Its only the question if UCT or Alpha-Beta is
superior.
Hi Chrilly,
Thanks for your report.
The question of UCT versus Alpha-Beta is not open any more in my
opinion. The current state of the art of Monte Carlo tree search is
about 500 Elo points stronger than the version of Crazy Stone you tested
against. Do you believe you can easily catch up with those 500 Elo
points ? Also, I am convinced that UCT has tremendous potential for
further improvement. I have improved Crazy Stone by about 50 Elo points
per day in the past 10 days (on 9x9. The improvement on 13x13 and 19x19
is much more). I am very confident that I can easily improve it further
very much.
Rémi
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
