hahaha, good point... good point. Although I still will stick with C++, I really ought to learn Lisp I think.
On Nov 22, 2007 2:43 AM, Raymond Wold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nick Apperson wrote: > > >But, to be fair, I totally agree that compiling python or ruby would give > >you noticable speed gains. And as always, speed comparisons are only > useful > >in context. In terms of go programming.... if you are prototyping use > >whatever the hell you want. If you are finishing something off, don't > waste > >my time with any of those slow languages (that includes java and c#). > > > > > I would posit that coding go, we are _always_ prototyping. > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
