By the way, my argument still applies when there are no outside liberties, because the eye filing itself is a long enough UCT "trap" (a sequence of moves that appears to be just like null moves). I gave a theoretical argument, but actualy it is not very surprising. Did you ever wonder why Mogo, being now so strong, could still exhibit so basic and stupid blind spots ? The explanation is very simple : Those blind spots reveal the fact that some aspects of its understanding do not scale as fast as the other aspects. Actualy for some aspects, it does not scale at all, from a practical point of view.
Ivan ----- Message d'origine ---- De : Michael Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : computer-go <computer-go@computer-go.org> Envoyé le : Mercredi, 23 Janvier 2008, 20h38mn 32s Objet : Re: Re : [computer-go] Bent four in the corner was:Scalability problem of play-out policies ivan dubois wrote: > I agree that the current implementation of Mogo (from what I know about > it) will not know for sure that the D17 black group is 100% dead. > It will think that it is X% dead and stick to that estimation, whatever > thinking time you give it. X is a constant that does not depend of > thinking time (no scalability). How are you arriving at this conclusion? It makes no sense to me. _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _____________________________________________________________________________ Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail http://mail.yahoo.fr _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
