Overall, it's a good read.
Nitpicks:
• The scalability graphs need to be clearer. Maybe add a caption or
change the single-threaded label? I looked at the graphs first and
took a bit to figure out why "single-threaded" outperformed all else.
• The RAVE section wasn't all too clear. I think it tried to
explain too much or tried too hard to avoid math.
• The scalability graphs aren't very informative once the win rate
gets too high. It'd be better if the reference had something like four
seconds per move instead of one
• The placement of graphs at the end felt awkward, but it may be
the best place for them since I believe the paper's goal is ease of
reading. Maybe make the references to the graphs less explicit in the
text?
Sent from my iPhone
On May 4, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Martin Mueller <mmuel...@cs.ualberta.ca>
wrote:
Our technical report describing the Fuego framework is now available
on
http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/research/techreports/2009/TR09-08.php
I will probably make at least one more revision, so all feedback and
suggestions are welcome.
Thank you
Martin
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
