> > > I am pretty sure that such an implicit expression exists: it is << the >> number of etc etc.... >> > > We do not speak of just the definition of what kind of number to find, but > of the construction of finding the number (or already of a compression of > its explicit digits).
It's hard to come up with a formal definition of "implicit expression" which excludes the definition itself :-) maybe something like a fast algorithm for computing a given digit (this exists for pi https://www.math.hmc.edu/funfacts/ffiles/20010.5.shtml ). (Well, it's fun, but I would not spend days on this :-) )
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
