On 5/8/07, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Listener says that copy has lower audio quality than the original, so he will have to hire a professional to do the same. Question: is it possible to lose quality when ripping and re-recording as I've described?
AFAIK, you can't lose any quality when ripping to a WAV - it has the same exact digital encoding that was on the CD. I would have said that the same was true in the other direction - everything is digital, after all. I don't see how the quality could change - even with a cheaper disk or cheaper reader, you are still just reading the exact same bits. -- John DeCarlo, My Views Are My Own ************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
