You can, Betty can, Steve can, I can. That is evidence. Some have better equipment than others. Some have hearing impairment to a greater or lesser degree. But the bottom line is that MP3 sucks, from an audio quality standpoint.
A high-bit-rate MP3 is just fine. No need to torture ourselves to reach some imaginary standard of purity. If you need a machine to detect something you can not hear it is really pointless. Music is intended for the enjoyment of humans, not to please machines.
I will continue to advocate the professional and accurate use of the computer in an audio role. But it's not a license to kill. I'll put the signal out as close as I got it in. Elvis has left the building.
************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************