You can, Betty can, Steve can, I can.  That is evidence.  Some have
better equipment than others.  Some have hearing impairment to a
greater or lesser degree.  But the bottom line is that MP3 sucks, from
an audio quality standpoint.

A high-bit-rate MP3 is just fine. No need to torture ourselves to reach some imaginary standard of purity. If you need a machine to detect something you can not hear it is really pointless. Music is intended for the enjoyment of humans, not to please machines.

I will continue to advocate the professional and accurate use of the
computer in an audio role.

But it's not a license to kill.

I'll put the signal out as close as I got it in.

Elvis has left the building.

************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************

Reply via email to