Stephen Warren wrote:
> It looks like we don't need to ship setupapi.h at all.
> 
> I deleted this file from libconcord, made sure I had the Microsoft
> Platform SDK installed, opened the .sln file using MS Visual Studio 2005
> Express, adjusted the include paths to point at the platform SDK, and
> everything builds just fine.
> 
> By my understanding, development on Windows pretty much always requires
> both a C compiler and a platform SDK installation, so this shouldn't be
> anything new to people building apps from source on Windows.
> 
> So, it seems we can remove setupapi.h from CVS, and add notes to
> INSTALL.windows that the platform SDK is required.
> 
> Marco: Do you agree?

If Marco can confirm your findings, I'll nuke it.

The less code we have to distribute that's not ours, the happier I'll be.

-- 
Phil Dibowitz                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open Source software and tech docs        Insanity Palace of Metallica
http://www.phildev.net/                   http://www.ipom.com/

"Never write it in C if you can do it in 'awk';
 Never do it in 'awk' if 'sed' can handle it;
 Never use 'sed' when 'tr' can do the job;
 Never invoke 'tr' when 'cat' is sufficient;
 Avoid using 'cat' whenever possible" -- Taylor's Laws of Programming


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
concordance-devel mailing list
concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel

Reply via email to