Yes. And many people do it that way. However in my case, they are
not only grouping poms, but also have overall scoping documentation,
since mostly they're not just "collections of subprojects" but groups
that you could say have a product definition. So we document stuff at
that level, since it's the logical parent of its child components. So
in our case, pom projects (with some exceptions) have more semantics
than merely "a bunch of stuff in modules"
Christian.
On 23-Jan-08, at 13:32 , Patrick Shea wrote:
When you say "Almost every one of my pom projects has a /src/site"
do you mean maven projects with packaging of type "pom" ?
Because apart from the top pom.xml the other ones (non jar/war/ear
etc) are usually just there to group sub projects under the module
section and have no other use. These are the ones I don't want to be
checked-out recursively.
Patrick
