On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 02:26:08PM +0200, Eric MC.D wrote:
> Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In Bordeaux some people criticized us for delivering non-free software
> > like Netscape in our first CD that we label "GPL Edition" is its
> > standalone version.
> >
> > Now we have a (rather funny) idea : why not trying to see if it's
> > possible to build up a 100% GPL product? This would involve removing
> > anything but GPL-ized stuff, that is XFree86, apache, etc.
> >
> > Does anyone here is interested in looking after this product?
> >
> > --
> > "Pixel, il faut mettre un peu de chaleur dans tes contacts humains" (c) Titi
> AMHA,
> I'm more interested in splitting it in 2 CD's.
> 1 for the 100% GPL packages.
> and 1 for all FREE packages.
> This way we have the choice to go 100% GPL
> the other way, one or more CD's with ALL free packages we
> haven't
> to download. This is also very interrested for newbie's
> who don't know what is avialable as free for use.
> Eric
>
>
nop a CD per liscence will be better :
imagine you could choose exacltly what kind of liberty you want..
so one for GPL
one for Qt
one for BSD (perhaps some dofferent BSD liscneces :)
one for MPL
one for Artistic
one for ...
...
--
Yves Duret
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
