Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > No, build_prior_82 should be set to 1. Or if you prefer rename > > %build_prior_82 to %build_prior_83 or %build_prior_90, > > post_82 ? > > > otherwise > > package name will change to uw-imap. IMHO it's a bit too late to do > > this right now (you know we are in deep freeze...). > > OK. we don't want the package to be renamed, but we do want the krb5 > functionality for 8.2, right? > > How about if a post_82 is defined where we put the name change in?
i fix this using the build_prior_82 tag in -4mdk in my people account (see me other mail) -- Yves Duret [EMAIL PROTECTED] piouk toujours et meme apres !
