On 23 October 2013 17:33, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> I might have been tempted to conserve on classes and code duplication to
>> share a serialization proxy between the classes and maybe even shorten the
>> name.
>> But it is hard to argue with the simplicity and directness of this design.
>
> I don't have a strong opinion on this, it could be something really like
> short (if Doug is inclined).

JSR-310 has a shared serialization proxy named Ser (one per package).
It can save a lot of space if multiple types are sent.

Stephen

Reply via email to