ping

On 12 March 2014 10:48, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote:
> This is a request for review of this bug:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035099
>
> The implementation for LocalTime with(MILLI_OF_DAY, n) and LocalTime
> with(MICRO_OF_DAY, n) fails to match the specification.
>
> LocalTime base = LocalTime.of(12, 30, 40, 987654321);
>
> LocalTime result = base.with(MILLI_OF_DAY, 0);
> expected: 00:00:00.000000000
> was: 00:00:00.000654321
>
> LocalTime result = base.with(MICRO_OF_DAY, 0);
> expected: 00:00:00.000000000
> was: 00:00:00.000000321
>
> The spec is clear in both cases - "This completely replaces the time
> and is equivalent to using {@link #ofNanoOfDay(long)}", thus this is
> clearly a bug.
>
>
> Proposed patch:
> https://gist.github.com/jodastephen/9057131
> The patch includes no spec changes.
> The patch includes new TCK tests that are derived explicitly from the spec.
>
> I need a reviewer and a committer please.
> thanks
> Stephen

Reply via email to