On Sat, 11 Jun 2022 05:48:14 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Expired Flags in 20:
>> 
>> - FilterSpuriousWakeups
>> - MinInliningThreshold
>> - PrefetchFieldsAhead
>> 
>> No remaining usages in code or tests.
>> 
>> - UseHeavyMonitors  (expired in PRODUCT ONLY)
>> 
>> As this flag now only exists for debug builds it has to be a "develop" flag 
>> rather than product. There are then changes to two tests that use this flag, 
>> so that they only run on a debug VM.
>> 
>> - test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/virtual/HoldsLock.java
>> 
>> The second @run that uses UseHeavyMonitors is moved to a second test segment 
>> that only applies to the debug VM.
>> 
>> - test/jdk/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/MapLoops.java
>> 
>> Change the test section that uses UseHeavyMonitors to only run on a debug VM 
>> and remove the IgnoreUnrecognizedOptions flag. Note that the existing test 
>> logic would run the same test twice on product builds.
>> 
>> No documentation in the manpage exists for any of the newly expired flags.
>> 
>> Obsoleted flags in 20:
>> 
>> - ExtendedDTraceProbes
>> 
>> Documented in manpage so moved from Deprecated section to Obsolete section. 
>> There is special handling for messages about use of this flag so that won't 
>> be updated until the flag is actually obsoleted (JDK-8279913).
>> 
>> - UseContainerCpuShares
>> - PreferContainerQuotaForCPUCount
>> - AliasLevel
>> 
>> Undocumented.
>> 
>> Java manpage updates:
>> - Updates Java version to 20
>> - Moved ExtendedDTraceProbe info as previously mentioned
>> - Applied changes from the .1 file that had not been applied to the markdown 
>> source so that they were not lost (and note the .1 file was also missing 
>> changes from the markdown file that had not been propagated).
>> - Removed an unrepresentable character (the section symbol) that was not 
>> being generated into either the html or nroff file correctly
>
> Marked as reviewed by alanb (Reviewer).

Thanks for the review @AlanBateman !

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9127

Reply via email to