On Wed 16/Jan/2013 07:19:17 +0100 Bernd Wurst wrote:
> Am 15.01.2013 20:01, schrieb Lindsay Haisley:
>> Slightly OT, but about half or more of Sam's posts to this list show an
>> invalid signature in my mail reader. The PGP (GPG) ID of the signature
>> is the same - 81E550E2 - whether it shows up as valid or invalid. Has
>> anyone else noticed this, and is there a reason for it, or is it perhaps
>> a local issue here?
>
> I can confirm this. Had to import Sam's key first to notice. ;-)
>
> The latest courier release info has a correct sig, the messages in this
> thread don't.
>
> I'm using current Thunderbird on Ubuntu Linux. While reading Lindsay's
> message, I remembered that I have similar problems here on my own.
Sam's signatures have been reported to break Enigmail since 2003. In
particular:
----- Comment #23 From Patrick Brunschwig 2007-04-24 05:11:53 -----
[...]
In theory it would be possible to switch to gpgme (and I somehow
have this in the back of my head for a long time), but it means to
rewrite all of the current backend, so it's quite a task.
https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/4/
The bug is still open, so I guess he hasn't switched to gpgme yet.
Enigmail conflated clearsigned messages and detached signatures (see
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2007-April/030916.html ).
I don't know whether Evolution's bug is similar.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery
and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts.
SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
