Anders Le Chevalier writes:
On 2015-04-02 12:59, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > There are no formal policies written in stone. What gets done is a > combination of what I want to get done, for whatever reason, > together with anything reasonable that someone else wants to get > done, and writes a reasonable patch for it. > Is there a reason in avoiding supporting optional features from new RFCs? I.E. supporting users who might want or need these features?
Can't think of any reason like that, of course.
pgpYeNmjR3No8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
