Hi, excuse me for jumping late into this thread, I'm running my own little filter and I am very interested in the filtering protocol (not using perlfilter, I skipped the thread.)
Sam wrote: > I think that probably the best thing to do is to append the control filename > to the message queue id, instead of replacing it (and modify dupfilter > accordingly). The message queue id itseld cannot contain any spaces, so > appending a space, and the control filename, should work. and then wrote: > I need to think about this a little bit more. If I can give my 2p, I would love to perform various actions upon detecting viruses, such as -bounce the message, for most users, -alter the message, for some other users, -silently cancel the message(?) for a minority of users, and -do nothing for the remaining users, if any. However, I wouldn't like to duplicate all of Courier code. After all, we are talking about one system that can run multiple filters. I'd prefer my filter to have a default action, and, if local preferences require any special actions to be done, then do them and save the results in some repository, leaving it to the system to work out which recipients deserve which treatment. Does that make any sense? Ciao Ale _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
