On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:04:19PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> Here I'm tempted to disagree. I'd love to have parrot seen as one of
> our cats to herd, even when the cat is not interested in being herded.
> I think we should not give up on them, but in the end it's up to them.
> Why? Because parrot uses the same infrastructure as modules and so we
> are in a good position to provide valuable input for them.
This is analogous to using CPAN-testers to, eg, smoke-test perl 5.11.
Probably useful as 5.11 (or parrot) approaches release, but not while
it's still under heavy development. And there's a seperate
parrot-smoking effort. I keep meaning to take part but never seem to
find the time.
--
David Cantrell | Reality Engineer, Ministry of Information
NANOG makes me want to unplug everything and hide under the bed
-- brian d foy
