On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Martin Evans <[email protected]>wrote:
> This smoker does seem to have a compiler but it is not set up right. I see > little point in a smoker doing this all day - it will generate loads of > reports for little gain - so I guess we'll have to disagree there. > > I guess I was interested to find out if this was deliberate or > unintentional. > If it's present, but misconfigured, then I agree with you, as that's misleading. But I'm supportive of modules that need a compiler actually checking for a compiler. Devel::CheckLib now makes this pretty easy. (Checking for no libraries at all does a simple compiler check). > So did I. I do not generate that text - it must come from > ExtUtils::MakeMaker, or MS visual C may be. > Oh! You're right -- I assumed was part of the long text like you had about reading the README. My mistake. Have you contacted the author directly? DAVIDRW is a CPAN author so "@ cpan.org" should work. -- David
