On 10/25/2010 10:50 PM, David Golden wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:49 PM, David Cantrell<[email protected]> wrote:
For CPANdeps etc, what OS should I report GNU KFREEBSD as? I'm guessing
that the userland is radically different from a "traditional" FreeBSD,
so do you think it would be appropriate to list it as "FreeBSD (Debian)",
seperately from the mainstream FreeBSD reports?
For CPANdeps, where you're providing a "proper" name (instead of
whatever abbreviated version is compiled into perl), I would suggest
stick as close to official names as possible. E.g. "GNU/kFreeBSD" or
"GNU kFreeBSD". Consider "GNU/Hurd" as a good example.
I agree - with the addition of GNU/Linux instead of Linux. However the
(cosmetic) problem this creates is a wide table in the matrix for
modules where many platforms have been tested, which looks ungainly.
-- David
-Nigel
