Hi Leo,
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:01:54 -0700
Leo Susanto <[email protected]> wrote:
> Shlomi, there is nothing particular, I just picked 1.7 randomly.
>
Picking versions of software components randomly does not seem like a robust
way to choose the most suitable version, and I certainly don't expect people
to want to help you with such a heuristic.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Shlomi Fish <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > XML-LibXML-1.70 is very old - it dates back to 2009. Since then,
> > we have released 1.71, 1.72, 1.73, etc. up to 1.99 and then 2.0000
> > up to 2.0004. There are many bug fixes, clean ups, and some
> > new features there.
> >
> > So what is your interest in this ancient version of XML-LibXML ?
> > Just wondering, in part because I maintain XML::LibXML and care
> > about it. I do not intend on agreeing to support such an ancient
> > version of it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Shlomi Fish
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
My Favourite FOSS - http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/favourite/
All Chuck Norris has to do is *look* at Perl code and it interprets itself
out of fear and respect. — DrForr
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
