* David Oswald <[email protected]> [2013-01-02T12:25:29] > Of course all this is with respect to older production-track Perls, > not older development-tracks. I agree that it's not useful for > retired development track Perl's to be used in smoke testing modules.
I am definitely interested in the results of older stable perls. Reports from 5.8 are welcome indeed. I only want to see an end to old development releases: >>> Can we all agree that there's no reason at this date to be smoking with >>> 5.13 or 5.15? So far, it seems we can. -- rjbs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
