> On Jan 11, 2018, at 12:10 PM, David Cantrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2018-01-11 17:27, Alceu R. de Freitas Jr. via cpan-testers-discuss wrote: > >> Is QNX relevant for Perl, considering is basically only applicable to >> BlackBerry... or I'm wrong? > > QNX used to be fairly popular for real-time and embedded industrial systems, > and those sorts of things have loooooong lifetimes. So even if Blackberry is > the only *new* user of QNX there will be plenty of older systems out there. > > OTOH, they're also the sorts of users who really ought to have their own > thorough acceptance tests for software changes, so I doubt they're relying on > CPAN-testers to make sure their industrial robots don't fall over > embarrassingly.
That may be true, but having QNX testing for high-river modules would help with the bleadperl breaks CPAN project. So, I'd say yes, it'd be great to have more testing for an OS.
