On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 05:59:16PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > > Am 01.06.2014 um 15:03 schrieb David Golden <x...@xdg.me>: > > > The only thing specified in the lancaster consensus is what must > > happen if that command-line argument is true. > > > > I think making a distinction between "0" and undefined will be > > surprising to people and I would recommend against it. > > Given this point - how can we give people an instrument to force XS > and fail if it's not available?
As I mentioned before - you create a separate ::XS distribution, against which the outliers declare dependencies. In general "forcing XS" when PP is available is *always* *invairably* the wrong approach (which is why they are called outliers above ;)
