I was looking at this thesis: http://incolumitas.com/data/thesis.pdf
and see that the author didn't try to attack the CPAN because "[it] had such a bad documentation quality". I assume* that he means it wasn't clear how to go about uploading a module. And I think he's got a point. It's not obvious to someone who's not already "in the know". I therefore suggest that we move (or maybe copy) the "how to contribute" section from http://www.cpan.org/modules/index.html to http://www.cpan.org/. PR here that copies the relevant section: https://github.com/perlorg/cpanorg/pull/32 * I have contacted him for clarification, because we all know what happens when we assume -- David Cantrell | Godless Liberal Elitist I know that you believe you understand what you think you wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you wrote is not what you meant.
