I agree. On Jul 5, 2016 18:43, "Karen Etheridge" <p...@froods.org> wrote:
> There should be -TRIAL releases of anything this far upriver, at the very > least. > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Sawyer X <xsawy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> YAML.pm. >> >> It isn't tool chain, but it is relatively upriver, so I thought this >> group would be interested. Additionally this idea can extend to >> non-core toolchain tools. >> >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:18 PM, David Golden <da...@autopragmatic.com> >> wrote: >> > YAML or YAML::Tiny? Only the latter is tool chain. >> > >> > On Jul 5, 2016 8:14 AM, "Sawyer X" <xsawy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> YAML broke some stuff. >> >> >> >> I'm beginning to think that YAML is one of the modules that could >> >> really use a CPAN smoke of its own. I think the more upriver the >> >> module, the more this becomes relevant. >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> > >
