If we use bundler with packaged gems (which we should, if we aren't), that's essentially the same as vendoring them, which is what we did before.
Agreed on avoiding use of binary gems. Are we using any? If so, we should use a non-binary equivalent if at all possible. On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Alexey Verkhovsky <[email protected]> wrote: > I do have a rather strong opinion that it should not use binary gems. This > adds a big barrier to entry, especially on Windoze. > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Alexey Verkhovsky > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Brian: >> >> I see you added Gemfile to CC.rb. Not having external dependencies, binary >> gems etc - this was, in fact, by design. >> >> The rationale was that this tool should be easy to install for people who >> know nothing about Ruby (because it was used on non-Ruby gigs; probably >> still is). Therefore, it should only require Ruby and nothing else (not even >> rubygems). Everything else is vendored. >> >> I have a tentative (i.e., not extremely convinced) opinion that it better >> remain this way. >> >> --Alex >> > > > > -- > Alexey Verkhovsky > http://alex-verkhovsky.blogspot.com/ > CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com] > > > _______________________________________________ > Cruisecontrolrb-developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-developers > > _______________________________________________ Cruisecontrolrb-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-developers
