On Jun 8, 2011 6:42 PM, "Brian Guthrie" <[email protected]> wrote: > If that's more appropriately tagged as 1.5, I think that's a > worthwhile conversation; I picked 2.0 because I figured enough time > had passed, and the structural changes were significant enough. > There's also some "future release" stuff lumped under 2.1. If you'd > like to add a release date to those milestones, which I haven't done > yet, I think that would be great.
Calling this a 2.0 sounds good to me given that its been a while and its been a lot of improvements. > The release dates you've suggested sound reasonable to me. I think the > 17th is about as aggressive as I'm willing to go, though, I think. > > There are more improvements I'd like to see to Bundler support, > including on that I think needs to happen prior to the release > (arguments need to be properly configurable, for one). I have some > local changes here that I'll push up soon. Theres quite a few improvements that could be made. I'm thinking things like paths to ruby, rake bundler etc. I'm not sure if we can push all this into master without pushing the timeframe up ahead by a couple of weeks which I understand, and am fine with. > We still need proper Windows support. As far as I can tell, there's no > good way to get Nokogiri running there, so I'm planning on removing > that dependency. Rexml is a good alternative to nokogiri, it's not all that fast, but we're not doing a lot of XML parsing. So we should be good in that regard. - Ketan studios.thoughtworks.com | eclipse.org/swtbot | @ketanpkr _______________________________________________ Cruisecontrolrb-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-developers
