Tilman Sauerbeck [2008-05-06 23:33]: > Johannes Winkelmann [2008-05-06 13:00]: > > Hi Richard, > > > > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:55:10 +0200, Richard Pöttler wrote: > > > Hi, > > > [...] So I wrote a git driver for > > > ports (attached) and some example configuration files for the namenlos > > > and opt > > > repositories (also attached). > > > > > > What do you think? > > This has a couple of nice properties: > > [...] > > If git gains a "partial clone" feature, that would definitely help. > > git clone URL --depth n > seems to give you a clone that only contains the n last changesets. > > I never tried it though.
How about this for the git driver: git clone --depth 1 --bare /tmp/gitdriverclone.git git archive --format tar /tmp/gitdriverclone.git | tar -C -x /tmp/co Then we can sync /tmp/co with /usr/ports/whatever, which means we can print nice stats about which file was updated. It's horribly inefficient, but it should be okay for small(ish) repositories. Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
pgpvimcbV0c9V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ crux-devel mailing list crux-devel@lists.crux.nu http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux-devel
