Tyler Close <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 02 October 2003 09:21, Jill Ramonsky wrote: > > I was thinking of doing a C++ implentation with classes and > > templates and stuff. (By contrast OpenSSL is a C > > implementation). Anyone got any thoughts on that? > > Given the nature of recent, and past, bugs discovered in the > OpenSSL implementation, it makes more sense to implement in a > memory-safe language, such as python, java or squeak. Using a VM > hosted language will limit the pool of possible users, but might > create a more loyal user base.
There's already a Java SSL with a simple API: http://www.rtfm.com/puretls/ -Ekr -- [Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rtfm.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]