I agree. The cryptodox page looks nice, but I would rather see the content go in wikipedia, which is worked on, and looked at, by many more people, a really beautiful community work.
--anton -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whyte, William Sent: January 26, 2006 10:07 AM To: Travis H.; cryptography@metzdowd.com Subject: RE: a crypto wiki There's also a crypto portal in Wikipedia itself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Cryptography FWIW, I'd rather see energy focused on the Wikipedia version, which more people are likely to use. William > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis H. > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:02 PM > To: cryptography@metzdowd.com > Subject: a crypto wiki > > http://www.cryptodox.com/Main_Page > > -- > "The generation of random numbers is too important to be left > to chance." > -- Robert Coveyou -><- http://www.lightconsulting.com/~travis/ > GPG fingerprint: 50A1 15C5 A9DE 23B9 ED98 C93E 38E9 204A 94C2 641B > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The Cryptography Mailing List > Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]