-- Paul Hoffman wrote: > At 11:40 AM +0200 9/5/06, Massimiliano Pala wrote: >> Jon Callas wrote: >>> >>> On 4 Sep 2006, at 4:13 AM, Travis H. wrote: >>> >>>> Has anyone created hooks in MTAs so that they >>>> automagically [sign email] >> [...] >>> Go look at <http://www.dkim.org/> for many more >>> details. >> >> This approach is MTA-to-MTA... > > No, it's not. The receiving MTA *and/or* MUA can > verify signatures. That is clearly covered in the > protocol document.
I do not seem to be able to use DKIM to for spam filtering. I would like to whitelist all validly signed DKIM from well known domains. One way of doing this would be for the MTA to insist on a valid signature when talking to certain well known MTAs, and then my MUA could whitelist mail sent from those well known MTAs In short, I am not able to get any advantage out of using this protocol, which means that there is no advantage in sending me signed mail. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG htNnuqbJ9fv6n64IRfD1zA7lLKKr2izEKeU8gcTj 4VIaWftcnkDyBJkkmq5thq8hruA/YIkpnczdJ3kzD --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]