Hey. Not sure whether this has been pointed out / discussed here already (but I guess Perry will reject my mail in case it has):
https://www.cdt.org/blogs/joseph-lorenzo-hall/2409-nist-sha-3 This makes NIST seem somehow like liars,... on the one hand they claim to surprised by the alleged NSA-conspiracy around Dual_EC_DRBG and that this would be against their intentions... on the other hand it looks as if they'd be trying the same thing again. Cheers, Chris. _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list cryptography@metzdowd.com http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
