2013/9/29 James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com>

> (..) fact, they are not provably random, selected (...)
>
fixed that for you

It seems obvious that blatant lying about qualities of procedures must have
some malignant intention, yet ignorance is as good an explanation. I don't
think lying the other way would solve anything. It's obviously not
especially secure.
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to