On 30 September 2013 10:47, Adam Back <a...@cypherspace.org> wrote: > I think lack of soft-hosting support in TLS was a mistake - its another > reason not to turn on SSL (IPv4 addresses are scarce and can only host one > SSL domain per IP#, that means it costs more, or a small hosting company > can > only host a limited number of domains, and so has to charge more for SSL): > and I dont see why its a cost worth avoiding to include the domain in the > client hello. There's an RFC for how to retrofit softhost support via > client-hello into TLS but its not deployed AFAIK. >
Boy, are you out of date: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication.
_______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list cryptography@metzdowd.com http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
